Elliott Organick's 1972 The Multics System: An Examination of its Structure (ISBN 0-262-15012-3) is available from the MIT Libraries as a digital reprint (Laser-printed copy or PDF download of a scanned version.)
The price is $61.75 for a printed copy including postage in the US, or $29 for PDF - presumably TIFF images and therefore not searchable. This compares favorably to prices of used copies I've seen quoted in the $130 range.
The printed version is laid out two-up on landscape 8.5 x 11 paper, two-sided, and bound with somewhat heavier cardboard covers. This is a copy of an original in the Barker library and has library stamps and minor markings.
It's not ideal, but it's certainly better than not having a copy or trying to xerox it myself. MIT already had it scanned, so I'd suspect mine wasn't the first request for it.
I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who gets the PDF version on whether it's the same layout, what the file size is, etc.
Mail from Dan'l Miller
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Dan'l Miller replied:
Recently I ordered and received a PDF copy of Elliot I. Organick's The Multics System: An Examination of its Structure.
The PDF file is 37,538,320 bytes in length (approximately 37.5 megabytes [MB] or 35.8 mebibytes [MiB], using IEC 60027-2 standard units). As another measure of the book's size, it is 392 printed pages scanned on 207 PDF pages. The layout is two printed pages per PDF page, turned counter-clockwise, requiring a clockwise turn of 90 degrees in a PDF viewer to read properly. Both the size and the orientation (as well as slightly sluggish page-painting time) indicate that the file is composed of bichromatic TIFF files.
The PDF page-set begins with the interior title page-leaf. No cover or fly-leaf pages are included. The following 7 most-likely-unique features of the printed copy from which the PDF is derived may assist you in determining the pedigree of your printed copy.
- On the title page the "O" of Organick is double underlined in handwritten
fashion as is typical of librarians during cataloging. On the copyright page,
the following LoC-classification system data is handwritten in the upper half
of the page, again as typical of LoC-system librarians:
QA76.5 .O686 C.4
- Also on the copyright page, the following pair of less-well-known(-to-me)
numbers is handwritten to the right of the LoC author information:
- Also on the copyright page, the following is rubber stamped:
"Barker Engineering Library" (in an ellipse) MASS. INST. TECH. MAY 16 1972
- On the first page of the contents (printed page v, PDF page 2 top/right column), the following apparently is handwritten: V00652, but the tops of each character are cut off.
- On printed page 3 (PDF page 12 top/right column) a curved line was handwritten to the left of section 1.1.1's heading, apparently as some reader's note.
- On printed page 5 (PDF page 13 top/right column) a curved line was handwritten to the left of section 126.96.36.199's heading, apparently as some reader's note.
- On printed page 6 (PDF page 14 bottom/left column) three check-marks were handwritten to the left of each of sections 188.8.131.52, 1.2.4, and 1.2.5, apparently as some reader's note. Also on this page is another check-mark at the upper left corner of Figure 1.1's core-memory bounding box. Also between the lower edge of the core-memory bounding box an arrow from Figure 1.1 title's "A process" points to a handwritten note in International Phonetic Alphabet "/dI 'pIkt/ v." followed by two Chinese characters, which presumably comprise the Chinese translation of the verb "depict", a conjugation of which appears early in Figure 1.1's printed explanatory paragraphs.
From that point forward the note-taking reader either refrained from marking that printed copy very much more, or ceased reading that copy, or my memory fades concerning any more handwritten markings as I read the remainder of the book.
I hope that these most-likely-unique marks aid you in deciding whether the PDF form is the master image from which your paper copy was printed by the MIT library's out-of-print service.
[Peter Flass confirms that his copy matches the PDF's markings]
15 Nov 2001, updated 15 Jul 2003, 15 Sept 2004